• Looking for Staff Banner

September 24, 2012

Australia achieves 500 Green Star certified projects

Filed under: Buildings — Tags: , , — tom @ 11:41 pm

The Green Building Council of Australia (GBCA) has certified 500 Green Star projects.

Responding to industry demands, the GBCA launched the Green Star rating system for buildings in 2003 to support the property and construction industry to reduce the environmental impact of buildings, drive innovation in sustainable building practices, improve occupant health and productivity and achieve cost savings.

“In nine short years, Green Star has radically transformed the footprint of our cities,” says the GBCA’s Chief Executive, Romilly Madew.

“These 500 building projects equate to eight million square metres of Green Star-certified building space around Australia – from offices to retail centres, and from schools to hospitals.

“This transformation has occurred through true market leadership.  Leading by example has pushed our industry from a ‘business as usual’ mentality to the forefront of green building expertise and innovation.

“With 500 building projects now under our belt, the emerging leaders in the industry are those companies making a portfolio or precinct-wide commitment to Green Star.  There are currently more than 500 projects registered to achieve Green Star ratings in the future,” Ms Madew adds.

The 500th project is Australand Property Group’s Keysborough Spec 1 development in Victoria, which has achieved a 5 Star Green Star – Industrial Design v1 rating.  The development comprises two large warehouses and office space inside one 27,000m2 building.

“It’s fitting that Keysborough Spec 1 is the 500th Green Star project, as it demonstrates how market transformation is extending beyond the office sector,” says Australand’s Sustainability Manager, Paolo Bevilacqua.

“For Australand, this Green Star certification gives us assurance that we’re ‘future proofing’ our asset, as well as reducing occupancy costs for our customers.  We believe this will give us and our customers a competitive edge in the market as utility costs continue to rise,” Mr Bevilacqua adds.

Romilly Madew adds: “Around Australia, governments are mandating Green Star for new schools, hospitals and large-scale developments because they know Green Star buildings are healthier, more productive and better long-term assets.  Developers are driving higher green benchmarks with each new project they undertake.  Building owners are insisting on Green Star ratings for all new acquisitions because they are more efficient and cost-effective.  Tenants are demanding Green Star to reinforce their brands, and attract and retain their most valuable employees.  And people are telling us they want to live in a Green Star community.

“The message is clear: Australia’s Green Star is ascendant,” Ms Madew concludes.

September 5, 2012

Australia Making the Grade in Green Building

Filed under: Buildings — Tags: , , — tom @ 4:56 am

green building question mark

With a total of almost 500 Green-Star certified buildings around the country, the push toward environmentally sustainable practices in the design and construction of buildings and infrastructure is gathering momentum throughout Australia.

Compared to other developed countries – at least in terms of energy efficiency – Australia’s current performance now ranks around the middle of the road. In a recent study by the American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy (ACEEE), Australia ranked sixth overall out of 12 of the world’s largest economies based on 27 energy efficiency metrics regarding buildings, industry and transportation and national policy.

The scorecard indicates that Australia is doing reasonably well when it comes to buildings but less well in other areas such as transport.

Even in terms of buildings, however, a number of commentators say we have room for improvement.

“I think we still have quite a bit to do within individual building design before we can honestly think that we are consistently ‘doing well at green buildings,’” says David Jarratt, director of WSP Built Ecology in Melbourne.

Referring to Australia’s ranking as per the ACEEE study, Jarratt says the country is indeed performing well in terms of energy efficiency but questions whether this alone is an adequate way to define an environmentally sustainable building.

Ann Gardner, a partner at iRubber P/L ESD rubber flooring in Melbourne, identifies products and choice of building materials as a significant issue and an area in which Australian builders can improve.

Gardner says that much as she tries to educate builders about the sustainable and longer-lasting features of her firm’s products, she has encountered a number of challenges in this area.

“We seem to have no problem getting our ‘green’ rubber flooring specified all over Australia, but at the moment we feel quite stuck at getting our ‘green’ rubber flooring actually ordered and installed,” she says.

Gardner says price and resistance to change are key stumbling points. With regard to price, she says there have been a number of cases where architects and designers have specified environmentally friendly products but builders have switched them at the last minute. She also says that despite strenuous efforts to talk to builders about new, environmentally friendly flooring products, ‘they usually go with what they know.’

Gardner also questions whether young builders coming through are being sufficiently educated about environmentally sustainable materials.

Nigel Howard, managing director at Edge Environment in Sydney, agrees with Gardner about materials. He points out that the building materials component is a much more significant factor in terms of energy efficiency as it pertains to overall environmental building performance in Australia than in much of the US, Europe and in Nordic countries where weather conditions are less benign.

Jarratt feels another issue is that, while there are many ‘good news stories’ around the marketplace regarding positive correlations between good indoor environment quality and buildng occupant productivity, he feels that in many cases, buildings that encourage these strategies are being pushed to the side, with mainstream alternatives that rely on decades-old technology often chosen instead.

2012 ACEEE International Energy Efficiency Scorecard

Outside of buildings, the ACEEE data indicates that Australia has considerable room for improvement.

Dru Spork, building services and sustainability manager at Grocon in Sydney, says Australia is well behind in transport, though that may be largely because “crazy vehicle/fuel taxation systems across Europe leave the average worker no choice but to consider lower mileage and public alternatives.”

Spork describes Australia’s infrastructure performance as ‘so-so’, saying the country’s ranking in this area is made to look better than its performance may actually reflect because Europe suffers from the same underinvestment in research and transmission lines.

On the bright side, however, Spork believes environmental values are more natural and integrated in the Australian way of life than in Europe, or at least in the UK.

“We were always in front with home recycling, building waste recycling, scrap metal return to the smelters things like that,” he says.

Yes, Australia does have nearly 500 certified green buildings – now spreading to include areas as diverse as schools, fast food restaurants and soon, fire stations. But in terms of overall building and infrastructure environmental performance, it seems the country still has room for improvement.

February 27, 2012

The Green Industrial Revolution Hits Australia

australia map made of grass

The industrial revolution was the major turning point in western civilisation. It was a time of industry greatness, of invention and one of the greatest periods of growth in history. Still today, most traditional industry practices are modeled on methodologies developed through this period.

However, the industrial revolution’s legacy has left some rather ugly footprints on the environmental carpet, and it is now with climate change and responsive carbon taxes, that modern society is paying the price of years of rapid  industrial growth and innovation.

In the past, Australia’s construction industry and the environment have often been at odds. That was until the Green Building Council of Australia (GBCA) implemented a clever design-rating tool, which would begin an era of the Industrial Design v1 rated building.

The beginning of the Green Industrial Revolution.

The clever mix of industry and sustainability is encouraging traditionally brown, industrial buildings to retrofit or newly build more environmentally friendly spaces.

“Green industrial facilities can deliver a range of benefits: increased operating efficiencies, reduced costs and environmental impacts, not to mention fewer worker injuries and higher employee satisfaction and performance” says GBCA Chief Executive Romily Madew.

Energex WorkplaceGaining a nod of approval from the GBCA as well as the title as first of its kind, Queensland’s ENERGEX Distribution Centre has achieved a 4 Star Green Star – Industrial Design v1 certified rating.

The building, which will act as the company’s new TradeCoast Central logistics warehouse has a total area of more than 52,000 sqm and is to be occupied by approximately 80 staff members and their equipment.

Again, as with many major developments, the sheer size of the building lends itself to a sustainable design in order to cut carbon emissions and associated costs.

“The energy saving initiatives at the centre will not only reduce our carbon footprint, but also our ongoing logistical costs” says ENERGEX Customer Services Executive General Manager Peter Weaver.

These energy saving initiatives include energy efficiency lighting and air-conditioning, in addition to double glazing.

A key aspect, and clever inclusion, is the ‘Coolmax’ roofing system. The material protects the building from solar heat gain that is commonplace in industrial buildings with traditional zinc roofs, which often heat up to unbearable temperatures in the warmer months.

2012 will be the year of the retrofit, and with such strong industry support it wont be long until many more developments join the ranks of this incredible industrial building. The industrial revolution has offered so much innovation and laid a strong industry foundation. It is now the responsibility of the modern industry to modernise outdated spaces and overcome the issues associated with great industrial growth.

By Jane Parkins – http://designbuildsource.com.au/the-green-industrial-revolution-hits-australia

January 31, 2012

Creating Interiors For a Green Star Building

Filed under: Buildings — Tags: , , — tom @ 4:29 am

Corporate Executive Board Interior

The idea of sustainable interiors is not a new one. In fact, after such a strong green building year in 2011, green fitouts, refurbishments and interior work in various forms has become a normal part of this industry, slotting itself comfortably into the green building sector.

While it often presents an exciting picture when retrofitting brown buildings or creating brand new spaces, it offers a number of challenges that can sometimes be limiting.

This is especially relevant when considering interior fitouts or refurbishments that take place in a building that has a Green Star standard. While the builder and design team do have creative, aesthetic and architectural power, they also have to keep in mind the standards and guidelines by which the rest of the building functions.

It is paramount that when taking on projects of this nature that the importance of the Green Star standard to the building is understood, and the refurbishment does not jeopardise it.

If it is a Green Star building there is a Green Star expectation.

One such project that has recently taken up this challenge is the culmination of TDA interiors and designers Sirens who have completed the refurbishment of the Corporate Executive Board (CEB) at level 9, 77 King St in Sydney. The building’s Green Star status meant that the refurbishment would have to be environmentally responsible in addition to meeting the aesthetic needs and wants of the client.

Corporate Executive Board Exterior

“We had to follow a number of protocols due to the building’s Green Star rating and consulted with Arup, leading sustainability engineers, to ensure all fire, electrical and air conditioning elements adhered to the strict guidelines,” says the interior fitout firm, “Getting all of this right meant we were able to deliver it well within the five week timeframe”.

The refurbishment involved the construction of an extension to the level 8 space, which now additionally includes half of the building’s 9th floor.

The office space includes comes to 400 sqm, which includes a breakout area, meeting rooms and management areas. Aesthetically the space is light, clean and functional, with light yellow wooden flooring and cabinetry with a bright warm lighting scheme and pops of white furniture. Splashes of quirky furniture has also been used in order to create a sense of whimsy, with Zenith workstations and Panton and Caper chairs by Herman Miller.

Due to the New Year and the release of the federal government’s Urban Policy Forum, there has been constant talk of a future greener Australia. In creating spaces that have a green expectation, such as these green buildings that have a Green Star standard that has to be met even years after through refurbishments and fitouts, the industry facet can never become a passing trend and instead becomes entrenched in the very foundations of our ever changing cityscapes.

Due to the New Year and the release of the federal government’s Urban Policy Forum, there has been constant talk of a future greener Australia. In creating spaces that have a green expectation, such as these green buildings that have a Green Star standard that has to be met even years after through refurbishments and fitouts, the industry facet can never become a passing trend and instead becomes entrenched in the very foundations of our ever changing cityscapes.

http://designbuildsource.com.au/creating-interiors-green-star-building?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=creating-interiors-green-star-building

By Jane Parkins

January 11, 2012

Australia Has a Banner Green Star Year

Ausgrid Learning Centre SydneyAustralias resiliance

2011 saw an incredible year of growth in the Australian industry. Our natural resource sector continues to boom, and economically we have been lucky enough to stay afloat, in comparison to the rest of the world, in light of the continued effects of the 2009/2009 GFC.

While the mining boom may be the cause for an incredible economical industry achievement, this country’s growth in another sector offers to portray our equally important social and environmental success.

This is seen through Australia’s incredible Green Star accomplishments and continuous growth in the green building sector.

As the federal government finally announced their carbon tax and ongoing emissions trading scheme, this industry stepped up to the plate and has delivered on a banner Green Star year, with the Green Building Council of Australia (GBCA) certifying a whopping 100 Green Star Buildings; the sustainable building authorities highest number yet.

Jacana House

“This is an extremely positive result, and demonstrates that even in a challenging market, the green building economy is flourishing” says GBCA Chief Executive Romilly Madew.

It has been an incredible year for Australia and green building. Formerly known for being rather sluggish in our sustainable building agenda, and one of the last developed nations to put together a carbon tax proposal, Australia is now home to more than 390 Green Star buildings with a further 550 registered for certification.

We have showcased numerous Green Star buildings including the award winning Melbourne ANZ Centre, Peregrin Spring State School Queensland (Australia’s first Green Star Education Design v1 primary school) and the $75 million Advanced Technology Centre at Swinburne University of Technology which achieved a 5 Star Green Star Education v1 rating.  The GBCA has listed their own standout 2011 Green Star projects. These include:

Flinders Medical Centre

With a 5 Star Green Star – Healthcare Design v1 rating, this Adelaide building is Australia’s first Green Star healthcare facility.

Jacana House

With a 5 Star Green Star – Office Design v2 rating, it is the first 5 Star Green Star building in the Northern Territory.

Energex Distribution Centre

This 4 Star Green Star – Industrial Design v1 building, located in Queensland, is the first of its kind.

Upper West Side Stage 1

This 4 Star Green Star – Multi Unit Residential Design v1 building, located in Melbourne, is also the first of its kind.

Ausgrid Learning Centre

Finally, the highly acclaimed 6 Star Green Star – Education as Built v1 project in Sydney has also been offered an Australian first rating.

Melbourne ANZ Centre

With a list of achievements such as these, it is little wonder that the GBCA is confident in their 2012 plans, focussing on the completion of their retrofit overhaul of all energy inefficient office buildings in Australia in addition to various other projects.

“Green Star has penetrated the office market in Australia to the extent that 18 per cent of CBD office space is now Green Star certified,” says GBCA Executive Director Andrew Aitkin, “Beyond offices, Green Star is influencing the design and construction of a range of other building types, particularly education facilities, and we are optimistic that 2012 will surpass our achievements in 2011.”

By: Emily D’Alterio

http://designbuildsource.com.au/australia-banner-green-star-year?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=australia-banner-green-star-year

December 9, 2011

Adelaide Oval and Innova 21 win national Consult Australia awards

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: , , , — tom @ 5:59 am

Aurecon has won awards for two projects in the Consult Australia awards: the Adelaide Oval and Innova 21.

The engineering, management and specialist technical consultancy received a Silver Award – Building (non-residential category) for the Adelaide Oval Western Grandstand Redevelopment project.

The Innova 21, University of Adelaide Building, was given a Certificate of Recognition, Building (non- residential category).

The Adelaide Oval redevelopment is already a multiple award winner with Engineers Australia and the Lightweight Structures Association, comprised the partial demolition and reconstruction of the existing Western members’ grandstand into a new AUD$115 million 14,000 seat grandstand, which retains its heritage.

Michael McDonough, Manager, Capital Works, South Australian Cricket Association, said, “Aurecon’s contribution was integral to the project’s success.”

The new grandstand meets the client brief by providing individual bucket seats with 80% shade by lunch and brings patrons up to 15m closer to the action. Within the central pavilion, a 600 seat dining room provides a first class function space coupled with panoramic views.

Aurecon provided total engineering services for the project including structural, civil, electrical, mechanical, hydraulic, fire protection, egress, wind, sports lighting, security, acoustic and audio visual design.

Some of Aurecon’s design solutions include advanced analyses and design for the feature diagrid roof, long span dynamically sensitive floor design, sustainable stormwater design and facilitation of the Safety in Design process.

The University of Adelaide’s new AUD$100 million Engineering, Mathematical and Computer Sciences building, Innova21, received a Certificate of Recognition, Building (non- residential category).

Mark Ellis, Aurecon Senior Structure Engineer and Project Leader said the building was designed to inspire students and can be used as a teaching tool due to its innovative features. “The design aims to inspire and involve the next generation of engineering and mathematics students to supplement studies rather than merely housing them,” said Ellis.

Aurecon performed advanced analysis and design of the ETFE (Ethylene tetrafluoroethylene) roof trusses above the exhibition area. Aurecon specialist structural glazing team’s façade design included curtain wall framing to the perimeter of the building, glass floors to the winter gardens, operable glass louvre walls and feature point fixed glazing to the ground floor areas.

The building has achieved Australia’s first six star Green Star rating for an education building from the Green Building Council of Australia and has received rave reviews from the students and teaching staff alike.

9 December 2011

http://www.architectureanddesign.com.au/Article/Adelaide-Oval-and-Innova-21-win-national-Consult-Australia-awards/532907.aspx

November 25, 2011

Sustainable Fitouts and Product Stewardship

Sustainable fitouts can be achieved in a variety of ways but have traditionally focused on reducing environmental impacts through the installation of energy and water efficient appliances and operating systems. Many of the energy and water efficiency measures are now standard practice and often legally required. The focus has now shifted to the use of sustainable materials, largely due to high churn rates associated with interior fit outs.

Targeting the consumption of resources through selection, use, reuse and efficient management practices of building and fitout materials is crucial for project managers working on green building developments. The various environmental and human health impacts arising from building materials are reduced when use of virgin materials is limited and special attention is given to the selection of ecologically and health-preferable materials. Product stewardship is also an emerging key concept in the closer examination of products for the built environment.

For manufacturers, this includes planning for, and if necessary, paying for the recycling or disposal of the product at the end of its useful life. This may be achieved, in part, by redesigning products to use fewer harmful substances, to be more durable, reuseable and recyclable, and to make products from recycled materials. Design for disassembly is a newer design concept that embodies these ideas. For retailers and consumers, this means taking an active role in ensuring the proper disposal or recycling of an end-of-life product.

With the release of the Green Building Council of Australia’s (GBCA) new Fitout Calculator, products that go inside a building, such as furniture and flooring, have never been more scrutinised. There is a growing demand for evidence of the consideration of the whole life cycle of a product such as the materials used to make it, how it is manufactured, and what happens to the product when it is no longer wanted. The key aim of the GBCA’s Fitout Calculator is to reduce the impact of churn rates on fit out items with a heavy emphasis on product stewardship. This is encouraged through the maximisation of Green Star points via reused products and certified products that have product stewardship policies.

A good case for the value of third-party certification of fitout products can be made when further reviewing the GBCA’s Fitout Calculator. If new products are being used in a Green Star Project fit out, they must be certified to be able to achieve 100% points. This was not the case with the old calculators, meaning that certification becomes more valuable as new, uncertified products cannot achieve this score.

Products that bear the Environmental Choice Australia (GECA) Ecolabel have been independently assessed as environmentally preferable. The GECA Ecolabel offers an accessible and convenient way for architects, designers, retail managers and stylists alike to choose certified products for use in fits outs, by providing instantly recognisable, trusted environmental credentials.

GECA’s Standards, against which products are certified, are developed in accordance with ISO 14024 and are based on global best practice, as are all of GECA’s 38 standards for products and services. The standards determine minimum environmental performance criteria across various aspects of a product or service’s life cycle, such as sourcing, manufacture, use and disposal.

GECA’s Furniture and Fittings Standard, for example, specifies that products should be designed for disassembly or reuse and repurposing, and requires product stewardship practices to be put in place. The GBCA, has actually recommended that product manufacturers review their current policies in relation to product stewardship, and make the necessary preparations to ensure products are able to comply with the criteria of the new Fitout Calculators.

Focus on fitout items is helping address the issues of sustainable production and consumption which in turn, can ultimately have significant impacts on everything in our natural world from raw materials to the issue of growing waste.

http://designbuildsource.com.au/sustainable-fit-outs-product-stewardship?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=sustainable-fit-outs-product-stewardship

November 16, 2011

Green Star – Performance

The development of Green Star – Performance continues to proceed at a rapid pace, with a third of the proposed credits already in a draft format. Our Green Star – Performance Project Leader, Robert Milagre, has recently returned from North America, where he met with his counterparts to discuss alternative approaches used in other jurisdictions.

“There are many similarities between the Australian and North American markets, and it is very heartening to see the success of the LEED tool for existing buildings, operation and maintenance,” he says. “The LEED-EBOM tool is certifying more projects in the US than the rest of the LEED tools combined – and we expect similar results in Australia once our Green Star – Performance rating tool takes off.”

Once the tool is released, the GBCA will be developing new education resources specifically geared for building operators and the facilities management industry.

http://www.gbca.org.au/media-centre/gbca-news/green-star-performance/4063.htm?MassEmailID=266987230&pkMemberID=38262

October 19, 2011

Sustainable Office Fitout | AECOM’s Brisbane Office

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: , , — tom @ 12:10 am

AECOM Brisbane Office Wooden FloorAECOM Brisbane Office Carpet Floor

Expansion, consolidation and mergers are all part of the corporate system; companies grow, shrink and diversify – it’s an intrinsic part of the ebb and flow of the business world. But part and parcel of these organic changes to companies, is the need to sensitively and harmoniously integrate the distinct cultures that define companies who merge together.

This was the challenge faced by AECOM in Brisbane, when they decided to bring their staff from eight offices across Brisbane, including four legacy brands, into a single office at the new Leighton Properties HQ development in Brisbane’s Fortitude Valley. And it raises the question of how you go about handling that kind of integration.

“AECOM was in a interesting stage of development,” explains BVN Architecture’s Project Principal, David Kelly, “they’re a global firm, but in Australia they have grown through merger and acquisition, including Bassett, ENSR, EDAW and Maunsell – all of whom had their own strong cultures – so this was a fitout which brought all of those different aspects together, bringing 850 staff from 8 locations around the city to create one united building, with 13,600m2 of space spread over 5 levels”.

Kelly says that goal was to use the fitout as an agent of change, a process of cultural change to help unify the various legacy brands and office cultures under the one AECOM banner, increasing communication between the various teams.

“They understood that there was huge potential in bringing together all of these specialities, so the brief was to create a workplace that would enable that potential to be unlocked by creating collaborative workspaces. They wanted to enable different, more efficient ways of working” he explains.

“Essentially, we wanted to create a modern, safe, sustainable, energy efficient space which would encourage and enable collaboration across our business” adds Frank Carlow, AECOM’s Project Director, who championed the project from within.

FILLING THE VOID

BVN’s design for the new offices essentially cut large voids through the existing building, in order to create a unifying space over the five levels of the tenancy. “An interconnecting stair links all five levels through these voids to create a dynamic common space and provide a sense of connectivity and transparency” explains Angie McKay, BVN’s Project Leader on the offices. “It was about having a communal rather than territorial approach to the arrangement of purpose-specific spaces to ensure that each group within the offices had an appropriate environment to support them”.

“What we’ve done in this workplace is to provide a variety of spaces, so you have the general open-plan workspaces themselves, but then you provide a variety of different rooms, quiet rooms that are close to work areas, so that when staff need a quieter space for meetings or phone calls they can quickly and easily access them” Kelly explains. “There are also café and meeting areas that are designed to draw people away from the general work spaces that are used for noisier activities. Which means that instead of being chained to your desk all day, you move about quite a bit”.

McKay says that the key was providing an intelligent environment that could bridge the boundaries between ‘design’ and AECOM’s strategic objectives for the new offices. The execution of the meeting spaces, consolidated support facilities, social gathering and creative spaces and open plan work environments had to provide opportunities and choices for how staff in the newly integrated offices could work, interact and communicate.

AECOM Brisbane Office ReceptionAECOM Brisbane Office Wooden Celing

“It was about transforming their existing work culture” she says. And it seems to have worked because AECOM have already noticed an increase in collaborative activity and productivity, improved staff retention and attraction and reduced operational costs.

Carlow says that the biggest challenge to that was “Winning the hearts and minds of our staff so that they were able to look forward to change, as many of them are long term valued staff members who have been with our various legacy companies for some considerable time”.

“We asked questions and listened, and from that level of understanding we were able to engage with groups and individuals within the company to develop a vision for what our new offices should offer” he says.

This process led to ideas like the ‘slot’, which refers to the recycled, timber-clad stairs, walkways and associated ‘bump spaces’ at the Wickham Street end of the building. Which as Carlow explains, “provide opportunities for staff both to move around the office without using the lifts, and also help enable the sorts of conversations between co-workers that result in improved collaboration and co-operation”.

FIRE SAFETY

The project wasn’t without hurdles though. “One considerable challenge we faced came about through the introduction of numerous base building interventions, including voids cut in the slabs and the introduction of an internal stair” explains Angie McKay. “These elements provided a sense of connectedness and transparency in the finished fitout, but also provided challenges in creating the compartmentalisation needed for fire separation”.

“As concealed fire curtains were not an acceptable solution to the Fire Brigade, we had to engineer an alternative solution” she continues, “Without Brigade sign off the space couldn’t be occupied, and that made it the greatest area of risk in the project. So we dedicated a considerable amount of time and energy to brainstorming and testing ideas, and eventually – thanks to some serious lateral thought – arrived at a solution which saw a series of floating meeting platforms that provided the separation we needed in fire mode, without jeopardising the visual connectivity between floors”.

A SUSTAINABLE SOLUTION

‘Holistic’ is a word that gets bandied about quite a lot these days, but it’s hard to think of a term that better describes the top-to-bottom approach that has been used in the new offices.

“Energy efficiency and sustainability were big factors for AECOM” David Kelly explains, “Though more from a point of view of their work culture than anything else. We did a lot of consultation with staff, as they have quite a young workforce who are very committed to sustainability, so it was a combination of the environmental work they do, and also a generational thing”.

Whilst the offices were a Green Star project (targeting a 5-star rating), McKays says that the point scoring was more of an outcome of the project’s sustainability objectives, than it was a driver for the design.

“Timber features heavily in the fitout,” she says, “all of which was 100% post-consumer recycled Australian Blackbutt sourced from railway sleepers and demolished bridges. Add to this the fact that the ventilation system provides 50% more fresh air than the average commercial building, the workstations are fully recyclable, the task chairs are ‘cradle to cradle’ accredited, worm farms in the kitchens harvest organic waste and green power switches replace “stand-by mode’ at every work point, the green agenda was embedded to a degree that, I think, pretty clearly show’s the company’s sense of environmental responsibility”.

AECOM Brisbane Office seating areaAECOM Brisbane Office Flooring

“The low power consumption we achieved in the offices was largely a happy coincidence” Kelly adds. “Our focus was largely on natural light, so we kept any built spaces away from the windows – which greatly reduces the demand on artificial lighting”.

This same approach led to things like the careful placement of utilities rooms, in order to reduce the number of printers/copiers etc. required. “Making utilities centrally located makes them convenient for everyone to reach and can substantially reduce your carbon footprint” Kelly says, “So it’s about a lot of small measures that add up to significant savings in power in the end”.

Other big savings came from a highly-efficient HVAC system, and building measures that reduced solar loads (and by extension the HVAC loads needed to maintain a constant temperature).

“It was critical that AECOM’s commitment to sustainability was demonstrated in the fitout” says McKay. “So the design team focussed holistically on supporting the initiatives of their green office policy as well as using sustainable building methods and materials in an effort to avoid a tick box approach with Green Star”.

This included a full furniture audit being carried out across the eight former offices. “What could be reused was, and what was purchased new met all of Green Star’s material requirements” McKay says. “We also used indoor plants extensively throughout the fitout which culminated with ‘Village Greens’ on three of the five floors, and these serve as tea-points and breakout areas. The planting solution for the fitout was developed in conjunction with AECOM’s Landscape Architects. 
Their Green Office group also produced a rolling screen saver which educates staff as to the various green initiatives and strategies throughout the office as well as the principles adopted in the fitout which are displayed in reception and on general office PCs”.

A WORKPLACE THAT WORKS

“Whenever I visit the new offices, the thing I get the most pleasure out of is the sense of energy it has, the buzz and vibrancy you get when you walk in” Kelly says. “We were very keen to connect all five levels of the offices, because we wanted to get that sense of activity throughout the building. As you walk into the reception you can see up and down all five floors, and see all the activity within it – so you get a tremendous sense of energy in the space”.

“We’re very pleased with the new offices,” Carlow concludes, “our staff have embraced the space and the concept of collaboration, and we now have project teams around the office which include non-AECOM staff as well as representatives from our clients’ teams – which is a quite different dynamic to the way the business is usually structured. And we are now able to translate this greater sense of collaboration to our clients, the market and our projects”.

The new offices were all about ‘change’, cultural change in integrating the previously distinct groups of the company, and operational change in improving the way in which staff work together. And they seem to have met those objectives with flying colours, so much so that the offices recently won the State Award for Interior Architecture at the Queensland AIA Awards. Though the real reward of course, is a workplace that works.

Images courtesy of Christopher Frederick Jones

October 18, 2011

Green buildings a plus for staff, business

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: , , — tom @ 10:46 pm

Jones Lang LaSalle’s director of sustainability, Joel Quintal, said assessing the drivers of office productivity was a complex topic. The quality of the physical environment – the issue at stake with ”green buildings” – was just one factor affecting productivity, he said.

The others included personal motivation and work satisfaction; organisational factors, such as the quality of management and pay rates; social factors – the relationship with office colleagues, or individual recognition within a business; and the role of technology such as IT and communication equipment.

An Ernst & Young report this week found that management issues (54 per cent), organisational structure (23 per cent), a lack of innovation (15 per cent) and outdated technology (8 per cent) were cited by employees as drains on productivity.

However, Mr Quintal told Business Day that high rates of natural ventilation and access to natural light were green building features that had a clear and undeniable link to increasing work productivity.

A 2005-06 case study of the retrofit of 500 Collins Street showed a 44 per cent reduction in the monthly average cost of sick leave. The study was done by Sustainability Victoria and the Kador Group.

Other findings were:

  • A 9 per cent improvement in the average typing speed of secretaries and a big improvement in overall accuracy.
  • One study found a 7 per cent reduction in headaches but another found a 20 per cent reduction. These studies also showed varying improvements in colds and flu, sore eyes, fatigue and poor concentration.
  • In one study, there was no change in productivity, but a different study found a 12 per cent rise in self-reported productivity.

Mr Quintal said 2003 research into Californian call centre and desk office work spaces concluded that performance was boosted by better access to outside views and increased daylight intensity, provided there was no glare from the window.

A March 2010 British study of 10,000 property and construction professionals highlighted the issues. Fifty-five per cent were unhappy with the office temperature, more than 38 per cent rated noise levels too high, 33 per cent were unhappy with the amount of daylight, more than 40 per cent did not have a satisfactory outside view, and 45 per cent were unhappy with the ventilation or air quality.

Mr Quintal said sustainability in building design was becoming a key element of decision-making for companies. ”The office workplace is becoming a strategic tool that needs to be linked not only to the operational bottom line, but also to every company’s human resource strategy.”

Further, green buildings were good for property owners and landlords.

Mr Quintal said a 2003 US study of 33 green buildings found a building’s value improved by $37-$55 per square foot due to productivity gains.

”The results suggested some of these gains can be attributed to superior ventilation, lighting and general indoor environment,” he said.

A study by Jones Lang LaSalle and CoreNet Global found 48 per cent of corporate real estate executives would pay up to 10 per cent more rent to occupy a sustainable building, he said.

Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/business/green-buildings-a-plus-for-staff-business-20111018-1lyk6.html#ixzz1bAyeehYM

Older Posts »