• Looking for Staff Banner

September 5, 2012

Australia Making the Grade in Green Building

Filed under: Buildings — Tags: , , — tom @ 4:56 am

green building question mark

With a total of almost 500 Green-Star certified buildings around the country, the push toward environmentally sustainable practices in the design and construction of buildings and infrastructure is gathering momentum throughout Australia.

Compared to other developed countries – at least in terms of energy efficiency – Australia’s current performance now ranks around the middle of the road. In a recent study by the American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy (ACEEE), Australia ranked sixth overall out of 12 of the world’s largest economies based on 27 energy efficiency metrics regarding buildings, industry and transportation and national policy.

The scorecard indicates that Australia is doing reasonably well when it comes to buildings but less well in other areas such as transport.

Even in terms of buildings, however, a number of commentators say we have room for improvement.

“I think we still have quite a bit to do within individual building design before we can honestly think that we are consistently ‘doing well at green buildings,’” says David Jarratt, director of WSP Built Ecology in Melbourne.

Referring to Australia’s ranking as per the ACEEE study, Jarratt says the country is indeed performing well in terms of energy efficiency but questions whether this alone is an adequate way to define an environmentally sustainable building.

Ann Gardner, a partner at iRubber P/L ESD rubber flooring in Melbourne, identifies products and choice of building materials as a significant issue and an area in which Australian builders can improve.

Gardner says that much as she tries to educate builders about the sustainable and longer-lasting features of her firm’s products, she has encountered a number of challenges in this area.

“We seem to have no problem getting our ‘green’ rubber flooring specified all over Australia, but at the moment we feel quite stuck at getting our ‘green’ rubber flooring actually ordered and installed,” she says.

Gardner says price and resistance to change are key stumbling points. With regard to price, she says there have been a number of cases where architects and designers have specified environmentally friendly products but builders have switched them at the last minute. She also says that despite strenuous efforts to talk to builders about new, environmentally friendly flooring products, ‘they usually go with what they know.’

Gardner also questions whether young builders coming through are being sufficiently educated about environmentally sustainable materials.

Nigel Howard, managing director at Edge Environment in Sydney, agrees with Gardner about materials. He points out that the building materials component is a much more significant factor in terms of energy efficiency as it pertains to overall environmental building performance in Australia than in much of the US, Europe and in Nordic countries where weather conditions are less benign.

Jarratt feels another issue is that, while there are many ‘good news stories’ around the marketplace regarding positive correlations between good indoor environment quality and buildng occupant productivity, he feels that in many cases, buildings that encourage these strategies are being pushed to the side, with mainstream alternatives that rely on decades-old technology often chosen instead.

2012 ACEEE International Energy Efficiency Scorecard

Outside of buildings, the ACEEE data indicates that Australia has considerable room for improvement.

Dru Spork, building services and sustainability manager at Grocon in Sydney, says Australia is well behind in transport, though that may be largely because “crazy vehicle/fuel taxation systems across Europe leave the average worker no choice but to consider lower mileage and public alternatives.”

Spork describes Australia’s infrastructure performance as ‘so-so’, saying the country’s ranking in this area is made to look better than its performance may actually reflect because Europe suffers from the same underinvestment in research and transmission lines.

On the bright side, however, Spork believes environmental values are more natural and integrated in the Australian way of life than in Europe, or at least in the UK.

“We were always in front with home recycling, building waste recycling, scrap metal return to the smelters things like that,” he says.

Yes, Australia does have nearly 500 certified green buildings – now spreading to include areas as diverse as schools, fast food restaurants and soon, fire stations. But in terms of overall building and infrastructure environmental performance, it seems the country still has room for improvement.

November 9, 2011

Australia Hits Mandatory Disclosure D-Day

The federal government’s full mandatory disclosure has finally become effective and some industry members are not happy. Those in the property industry have called the nation wide climate change move ‘risky’ and ‘premature’.

Mandatory Disclosure of Energy Efficiency in Commercial Buildings is the process whereby commercial premises (of 200 sqm or over) must disclose the energy efficiency of their space and meet higher performance energy ratings. The rating system now to be met by commercial spaces is that of the National Australian Built Environment Rating System, or NABERS rating tool.

Known as the Building Energy Efficiency Disclosure (BEED) act, the move will become the first incremental step in the federal government’s National Framework for Energy Efficiency plans, which aims to reduce energy consumptions in order to meet carbon offset goals.

In order to comply with the BEED measures; a Building Energy Efficiency Certificate (BEEC) must be obtained. The certificate verifies three elements including an energy efficiency rating, tenancy lighting assessment (lighting playing a key role in the new act) and energy efficiency opportunities. The energy efficiency rating is clear cut, with the building’s base or whole building rating to meet NABERS protocols, with lighting and energy ratings aptly certified.

The new higher levels of expected performance rating is what certain members of the industry have disagreed with, calling it ‘too much, too soon’. They have, however, had a year to get used to the idea. The proposed disclosure was presented some years ago, with the transition beginning last year. And it is not without cause. Commercial premises create up to approximately 10% of all of Australian greenhouse emissions.

It is perhaps the large fines that are truly bringing the disgruntled industry response, with initial compliance failures bringing with them up to $110,000 worth of fines, with up to $11,000 additional fees for each day that the criteria is not met.

Harsh? Perhaps. But it is difficult to denigrate a government initiative for costly fines, when adhering to the changes could save property owners from 30 – 60% on their lighting and energy costs. The move is, however, fair. It is simply not acceptable for new buildings to have to meet such rigorous energy efficiency ratings, when built spaces have to meet none.

This move has the ability to drastically cut carbon emissions in this country, as well as putting pressure on commercial building owners to stand accountable for their contribution to it.

In terms of risk, the only risk involved is if owners do not change low standards. Premature? The aforementioned year of phasing is long enough to make drastic retrofit changes.

Accountability is the key issue here. It has been a long time coming that the carbon excess blame in this country be taken out of government hands and put into the hands those who can, on the ground level, do something about it.

November 1, 2011

Energy certificates draw ire

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: , , — tom @ 9:53 pm

The industry says it’s too much too soon.

THE property industry has criticised the federal government’s introduction of full mandatory disclosure for office buildings as premature.

”The government should have provided a lot more breathing space for industry to get the assistance to comply with the legislation,” Property Council of Australia chief executive Peter Verwer said.

As of yesterday, under the commercial building disclosure program, a building energy efficiency certificate is required if more than 2000 square metres of office space is sold, leased or subleased.

The certificate includes energy and lighting ratings, but does not stipulate a minimum environmental standard, as previously reported. The law applies to building owners and also tenants who sublet the space. Failure to comply may result in fines up to $110,000 for the first day of non-compliance and up to $11,000 for each extra day.

The parliamentary secretary for climate change and energy efficiency, Mark Dreyfus, said the program made information available on the energy efficiency of large commercial office buildings. ”Energy efficiency directly impacts running costs for the occupiers of buildings. Disclosure of this information before sale or lease will greatly assist potential buyers and tenants make informed decisions,” he said.

There are more than 21 million square metres of commercial office space in Australia’s major urban areas, spread across more than 3900 buildings. Commercial buildings account for about 10 per cent of Australia’s total greenhouse gas emissions.

The CBD program is managed by the federal Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency. A certificate includes a National Australian Built Environment Rating System (NABERS) energy star rating for the building; an assessment of tenancy lighting in the area that is being sold or leased; and general energy efficiency guidance.

The tenancy lighting assessment provides a nominal lighting power density measurement in watts per square metre.

Mr Verwer said the property council was critical of the lighting requirements. ”It took the department 10 months to develop the lighting tool or rating system and 10 weeks to implement it. It’s simply unfair. It was flagged last year as an interim measure, but there has been no education,” he told BusinessDay.

Mr Verwer said CBD assessors had only had their first training in August and September and were untested. Industry supported the first part of the certificate – a base building rating using a tried and tested NABERS scheme – and was committed to mandatory disclosure. But industry was never happy with the methodology used on the lighting standards. ”It was not properly pilot tested,” Mr Verwer said.

Energy Efficiency Council chief executive Rob Murray-Leach said the lighting assessment added an extra dimension to the information that must be disclosed. ”Switching to efficient lighting can cut tenants’ lighting bills by 30 to 60 per cent,” he said.

March 21, 2011

New Green Plumbing Trade tower swings open

The new Swinburne TAFE Green Plumbing Trade school building opened in Croydon, Melbourne last week.

The first of its kind in Victoria, the complex incorporates a trades building and plumbing tower to deliver green training for the building, construction and plumbing fields.

Ten thousand new apprentices will be trained over the next five years.

The new Green Plumbing School will teach Plumbing pre-apprenticeships, Cert III in Plumbing, Cert IV in Plumbing and Services Operations Stream and Solar short courses.

The project added approximately 3,500 sqm of floor space to the Swinburne campus.

There are 400 students at the Green Plumbing School, and 120 apprentices will start in 2012.

The $10 million project was part of the Federal Government’s $200 million Training Infrastructure Investment for Tomorrow program which delivered 32 projects at TAFE institutes across Australia.

The Minister for Climate Change and Energy Efficiency, Greg Combet, joined Mike Symon, the Federal Member for Deakin, to open the federally-funded facility.

Combet said: “The Green Plumbing Trade School supports local green industries by providing skilled tradespeople.”

Symon said: “This is a great result for local families as there are now many more places for apprenticeships and training in the green trades of the future.”

“I started my apprenticeship in electrical trades in 1982 and worked for 20 years as a qualified electrician. Investing in expanding the number of apprenticeships and training places locally gives opportunities for long term careers. It is also the way that we can deal with the growing skills gap in these emerging industries.”

Posted at: http://www.sustainablebuildingproducts.com.au/news/new-green-plumbing-trade-tower-swings-open?utm_source=20110321&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=newsletters

Date Posted: 21 March 2011